Michelin Sommerreifen motorcycle-tyres Energy Saver+ ( 205/60 R15 91V EV Suitable )
Vor- und Nachteile
von unseren Spezialisten
Der Michelin Energy Saver+ 205/60 R15 91V ist ein sparsamer Sommerreifen in der Touring-Klasse und wird häufig von Vielfahrern gewählt. In mehreren unabhängigen Tests und Nutzerbewertungen wird diese Serie für ihren geringen Kraftstoffverbrauch und die sehr hohe Laufleistung gelobt; viele Fahrer erzielen deutlich mehr Kilometer als im Durchschnitt. Zudem fällt der Reifen durch hohen Fahrkomfort auf: ruhiges Abrollen, relativ wenig Geräusch und ein berechenbares, stabiles Fahrverhalten auf trockener Fahrbahn. Neuere Vergleichstests zeigen jedoch, dass Bremsweg und Kurvengrip auf nasser Straße nicht mehr zur absoluten Spitze im Premiumsegment gehören, vor allem im Vergleich zu moderneren Sommerreifen. Der Kaufpreis liegt zudem spürbar über vielen Modellen der Mittelklasse, während der Reifen weniger auf eine sehr dynamische oder sportliche Fahrweise ausgelegt ist. Am besten eignet er sich für Fahrer, die viele lange, ruhige Strecken fahren und maximalen Wert auf Kraftstoffersparnis und Haltbarkeit legen, weniger auf extreme Leistung im Regen oder sportliches Fahren.
Bewertungen von Michelin Sommerreifen motorcycle-tyres Energy Saver+ ( 205/60 R15 91V EV Suitable )
Basierend auf 51 Bewertungen
NU categoric ...clar nu as cumpara aceasta anvelopa dupa 3000 km de mers pe sosea anvelopa spate a capatat o galma ...deviatie nici nu pot descrie....repet fara sa fac offroad...nu pot sa mi explic deoarece in primi 1000 km a mers bine...dezamagit....va las un telefon 0723362588
NU categoric ...clar nu as cumpara aceasta anvelopa dupa 3000 km de mers pe sosea anvelopa spate a capatat o galma ...deviatie nici nu pot descrie....repet fara sa fac offroad...nu pot sa mi explic deoarece in primi 1000 km a mers bine...dezamagit....va las un telefon 0723362588
cristian cana
22. Oktober 2025
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
Anonymous
16. April 2021
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
Anonymous
16. April 2021
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
Rainer Lange
12. Jänner 2021
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
Rainer Lange
12. Jänner 2021
